12/14/2023 0 Comments Crop sensor vs full frame canon macro![]() ![]() Viewfinder brightness is not as important as is contrast, and clarity of the image as seen on the viewfinder screen. I some APS-C cameras I've had, the viewfinders used BATTERY power (yes!) to artificially boost the brightness of the viewfinder image remove the battery,and the viewfinder goes immediately very dim, dingy, awful.that says something right there. ![]() Like, for example, the D700 had a round eyepiece,and had a good viewfinder, 96% coverage as I recall, but the D3x had a simple spectacular viewfinder,with 100% coverage, and the best of the best in the viewfinder system components and build. The differences between cameras can be subtle, yet discernable. One can check the factory specification lists for viewfinder magnification, as well as eye relief, and get an idea of how large the viewfinder image is the D2x or D500 are going to be probably the very-best APS-C viewfinders Nikon has ever made.I find the D610 I own not that good of a viewfinder, and same with the 's just NOT that high-end of a camera when it comes to the total viewfinder system. ![]() The rectangular finder eyepiece Nikons are not as good through the viewfinder as are the round eyepiece cameras (as on the D600 series and the D750) Nikons are not as crisp as the. Yeah.the round-eyepiece in a Nikon means "top-rade viewfinder", and has for a long, long time. I think one ought to use whatever one prefers to use. I dunno.D500,D750.both are modern, similar MP counts.if you'd move to a 36-MP FX or a 45-MP FX, then it's be a different kettle of fish. And this is where Live View might be a big help. The pentamirror bodies just do not HELP me, but rather, get in my way, when it comes to looking at and adjusting the image/composition/focus. That said.many people find that Live View and the large,crisp, bright image it provides levels the playing field between APS-C and FX as far as being able to compose well, see well,and focus well.Ī good example of what I mean is like say, the Fuji S2 Pro d-slr, or the Nikon D3200.low-end bodies, with a pentamirror viewfinder, and a somewhat 'economy' viewfinder system in total, as opposed to say the BEST APS-C viewfinder Nikon made, in the $5,000 D2x body, or the D500 body's extremely contrasty,bright, and crisp viewfinder: being able to literally SEE everything, super-clearly, is a major plus to me. Also used the Nikkor 300/4 AF-S with extension tube and/or a 1.4x converter. Lenses were "real" macro models, among them 55mm/3.5 manual focus,60mm/2.8 AF-D,90mm/2.8 AF-SP,100mm USM-IF/2.8,and 180mm/3.5 APO-HSM ED-IF from Sigma. To me, using the camera's viewfinder, I like the full-frame cameras for their larger, better,crisper viewfinder image, compared with low-end cameras that were APS-C and which had rather poor viewfinder image quality, due to pentamirror design, or just that small, tunnel-like APS-C viewfinder that is a hallmark of APS-C amateur cameras. I've shot macro with APS-C cameras from Fuji,Canon,and Nikon, and have shot macro with FF cameras from Canon and Nikon. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |